Pollution in Minority Newborns

Laboratory tests commissioned by Environmental Working Group have, for the first time, detected bisphenol A (BPA), a plastic component and synthetic estrogen, in umbilical cord blood of American infants.

9 out of 10 Tested Had BPA

Nine of 10 randomly selected samples of cord blood tested positive for BPA, an industrial petrochemical produced by the millions of tons annually to make polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. BPA has been implicated in a lengthening list of serious chronic disorders, including cancer, cognitive and behavioral impairments, endocrine system disruption, reproductive and cardiovascular system abnormalities, diabetes, asthma and obesity.

Up to 232 Chemicals Found in Newborns

In all, the tests found as many as 232 chemicals in the 10 newborns, all of minority descent. While the sample is too small to project national trends, the minority cord blood study, commissioned by EWG in conjunction with Rachel’s Network, has produced hard new evidence that American children are being exposed, beginning in the womb, to complex mixtures of dangerous substances that may have lifelong consequences.

Stronger Measures Needed to Protect Pregnant Women

Scientists and health experts are pressing for stronger measures to protect pregnant women and infants from BPA and other environmental pollutants that disrupt the endocrine system. In June 2009, the Endocrine Society, comprised of 14,000 hormone researchers and medical specialists in more than 100 countries, warned that “even infinitesimally low levels of exposure [to endocrine-disrupting chemicals] –indeed, any level of exposure at all– may cause endocrine or reproductive abnormalities, particularly if exposure occurs during a critical developmental window. Surprisingly, low doses may even exert more potent effects than higher doses.”

And in November 2009, the American Medical Association Board of Delegates approved a resolution that called on the federal government to minimize the public’s exposure to BPA and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals. The measure was advanced by the Endocrine Society, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Environmental Working Group believes that any chemical found in cord blood should be given highest priority for tough regulatory action to protect public health.

Executive Summary

Download the full report.

A two-year study involving five independent research laboratories in the United States, Canada and the Netherlands has found up to 232 toxic chemicals in the umbilical cord blood of 10 babies from racial and ethnic minority groups. The findings constitute hard evidence that each child was exposed to a host of dangerous substances while still in its mother’s womb.

The research, commissioned by the Environmental Working Group in partnership with Rachel’s Network, marks the most extensive investigation of the particular environmental health risks faced by children of African American, Hispanic and Asian heritage.

The laboratory analyses represent the first reported detections in American newborns for 21 contaminants. Among them:

• Bisphenol A (BPA), a derivative of the petrochemical benzene essential to the manufacture of tough polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins that are fabricated into a wide variety of modern products, including metal food cans, hard plastic infant formula bottles, water bottles, safety helmets and glasses, television, computer and cell phone housings, compact discs and high performance coatings. BPA is a synthetic estrogen that researchers have found to disrupt the endocrine system, disrupt normal reproductive system development and diminish test animals’ intellectual and behavioral capacity.

• Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), a fire retardant for circuit boards that interferes with thyroid function and may inhibit the production of T cells the body uses to fight disease, undermining immune defenses against bacteria, viruses and cancer. TBBPA can break down to BPA, and when incinerated it creates brominated dioxins, which are considered likely human carcinogens.

• Galaxolide and Tonalide, polycyclic musks that are synthetic fragrances in cosmetics, laundry detergent and other scented products and that have been detected in numerous biomonitoring studies of pollution in people and in the aquatic environment.

• Perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA, or C4), a member of the perfluorocarbon (PFC) chemical family used to make non-stick, grease-, stain- and water-resistant coatings for consumer products, including brands Teflon, Scotchgard and Goretex. The most studied PFCs, the Teflon chemical PFOA and the Scotchgard chemical PFOS, are linked to cancer, birth defects and infertility. PFCs are extremely persistent in the environment. There is almost no toxicological data for PFBA in the public domain.

• Previously Undetected Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Developed as industrial lubricants, coolants and insulating materials, also used in caulk, PCBs were effectively banned in the late 1970s but are long-lasting in the environment. The U.S. government lists PCBs as probable human carcinogens. According government and academic scientistsscientists, PCBs have been shown to disrupt the endocrine system and damage the immune system, and are toxic to the developing brain.

What’s Unique About EWG’s Biomonitoring Research?

This study is EWG’s 11th biomonitoring investigation. To date, EWG studies have found up to 493 industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides in people, from newborns to grandparents. Our goal is to quantify the pollution in people, or what we call the “human toxome,” and to drive science and policy changes to protect public health.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has published biomonitoring study results involving thousands of people nationwide over the past decade. Its Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, released Dec. 10, 2009, lists detections of 212 pollutants found in representative samples of the U.S. population.

EWG’s biomonitoring program complements the CDC in three key respects:

1. More chemicals: CDC looks for fewer chemicals, but in larger, statistically representative samples of the U.S.population. EWG studies typically look for more chemicals than the CDC, but in smaller sample cohorts. EWG has detected up to 493 chemicals in people, compared to 212 reported by the CDC. EWG relies on specialized laboratories around the world to maximize the scope of its analyses.

2. Mixtures in each person: Mixtures in each person:

3. Early life exposures: CDC tests adults and children age 6 and up. The agency rarely tests cord blood or infants. EWG studies include cord blood, infants and toddlers to help document exposures during the most vulnerable periods of development.

Some racial and ethnic minority communities in the U.S. experience disproportionate exposures to environmental pollution (Brulle and Pellow 2006). Whether through poverty or historical patterns of discrimination, some are more likely to live near busy roads, industrial sites and in older housing. These factors, combined with workplace exposures, diet and use of certain consumer products, may lead to greater contamination with chemicals. When combined with poor nutrition and health, the adverse effects of having a greater chemical body burden can be aggravated.

In spite of the acute need to understand prenatal exposures in all segments of American society, EWG could find no studies that examined the chemical body burden in the womb for minority children. This study is a first attempt to fill that void.

The 10 children in this study were born between December 2007 and June 2008 in Michigan, Florida, Massachusetts, California and Wisconsin. They are otherwise anonymous.

We have no way of knowing anything about the homes and neighborhoods into which they were born. This study tested for chemicals that can be found in virtually every American household. We did not test for chemicals, such as the byproducts of smoking or alcohol consumption, that would indicate behaviors by the mother that could in any way jeopardize the health of the child. We also did not test for chemicals from local pollution sources.

We cannot determine how chemical exposures in utero may vary from one community to another, but our results strongly suggest that the health of all children is threatened by trace amounts of hundreds of synthetic chemicals coursing through their bodies from the earliest stages of life.

The contaminants found in these children are from unintended exposures to some of the most problematic consumer product and commercial chemicals ever put on the market. Their presence in fetal cord blood represents a significant failure on the part of the Congress and government agencies charged with protecting human health.

Scientists know far too little about the health threats posed by exposure to toxic chemicals in the womb. There is broad agreement, however, that the dangers are greater when exposure occurs before birth. Just how much more dangerous is not known.

Brominated flame retardants, PCBs, the Teflon chemical PFOA and the Scotchgard chemical PFOS, BPA, lead, mercury, perchlorate, dioxins and furans are all considered either likely human carcinogens, serious neurotoxins or well-established hormone disrupters, according to government health authorities. Many are strongly linked to more than one of these effects.

Recommendations

Government, academic and independent biomonitoring studies, including those by EWG, have detected up to 358 industrial chemicals, pesticides and pollutants in the cord blood of American infants. Exploring the so-called “additive” effects of possible carcinogens, hormone disrupters and neurotoxins is a new and urgent priority for environmental health scientists. EWG supports this very important work.

But as this science moves forward, we need to act now to reduce exposures that present the greatest health threats based on what we know today, even as scientists struggle to understand how the cocktail of chemicals in the womb could harm current and future generations.

Many of the up to 232 compounds detected in this study have been the target of regulatory action and government controls. As a rule, however, these actions came far too late, well after the environment and the human race were polluted to a degree that has raised serious health concerns. Our failure to act quickly has ensured that these chemicals will continue to pollute future generations for decades, even centuries to come.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has identified several of the substances found in this study as priority chemicals of concern. These include BPA, brominated flame retardants and the entire class of perfluorinated (Teflon and Scotchgard) chemicals.

In our view, any chemical found in cord blood should be a top candidate for tough regulatory action to protect public health.

To ensure a full accounting of chemical exposure before birth, we recommend that the CDC initiate a comprehensive cord blood-testing program. This work should be coordinated with ongoing biomonitoring in the National Children’s Study but should seek to identify and quantify the full extent of chemical exposures in the womb over time. The complete costs of this work must be borne by industry.

BPA and other Cord Blood Pollutants

The Environmental Working Group, in partnership with Rachel’s Network, commissioned five laboratories in the U.S., Canada, and Europe to analyze umbilical cord blood collected from 10 minority infants born in 2007 and 2008. Collectively, the laboratories identified up to 232 industrial compounds and pollutants in these babies, finding complex mixtures of compounds in each infant.

This research demonstrates that industrial chemicals cross the placenta in large numbers to contaminate a baby before the moment of birth. Test results are shown below.

Chemicals Detected in Umbilical Cord Blood from 10 Minority Newborns

Notes:
1.) Numbers are expressed as a range because several PBDEs are tested for in pairs; a positive result may mean one or both are present. The range reflects the minimum and maximum number of possible positive results.
2.) Numbers are expressed as a range because many PCNs are tested for in groups of two or three chemicals; a positive result may mean that one, some, or all are present. The range reflects the minimum and maximum number of possible positive results.
3.) Numbers are expressed as a range because many PCBs are tested for in groups up to six at a time: a positive result may mean that one, some, or all are present. The range reflects the minimum and maximum number of possible positive results.

BPA - plastics chemical

Key findings:

• First ever detection of BPA in U.S. cord blood. Found in 9 of 10 cord blood samples tested.

What is it? - BPA is a petrochemical derivative used to toughen polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resin.

How does it contaminate cord blood? - BPA is found in food, beverages and infant formula sold in metal cans (lined with BPA-based epoxy resin), drinks in polycarbonate plastic containers (made from BPA). Because epoxy resin and polycarbonates are unstable, BPA in food packaging leaches readily into any food or liquids the packaging touches.

Health risks - BPA acts as a synthetic estrogen that disrupts the endocrine system and causes other harmful effects, even at very low doses. In test animals, BPA induces abnormal reproductive system development, diminishes intellectual capacity, causes behavioral problems and has induced reproductive system cancer, obesity, diabetes, early puberty, resistance to chemotherapy, asthma, cardiovascular system problems and other chronic ailments.

Regulatory status - The FDA is considering whether to regulate BPA in food packaging. Minnesota and Connecticut, Chicago, Suffolk County, N.Y., and Schenectady County, N.Y., have banned BPA in baby bottles and other children’s food containers and utensils, and Massachusetts has issued a strong warning against them. In 2009, bills to ban or restrict BPA were introduced in the U.S. Congress and 21 states. Major baby bottle and sports bottle makers have voluntarily switched to non-BPA plastics, but the food canning industry has not developed non-BPA linings for metal cans.

Discussion:

Tests performed by the Division of Biological Sciences at the University of Missouri-Columbia identified BPA in cord blood from 9 of 10 minority newborns. Cord blood studies in Asia and Europe have found traces of BPA in cord blood, but until now, scientists have not reported finding the chemical in cord blood of American infants.

The impact on human health of BPA, a ubiquitous plastic component detected by CDC researchers in 93 percent of Americans over age 6 (Calafat 2008), is a major research priority [http://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/releases/2009/bisphenol-research.cfm] for federal scientific institutions and major independent research laboratories around the world.

Scientists discovered that BPA was a synthetic estrogen as early as 1936 but exposure to traces of the chemical was thought to be harmless until 1997, when a team led by Missouri biologist Frederick Vom Saal demonstrated that very low doses of BPA caused irreversible damage to the prostates of fetal male mice. Since then, scores of animal studies have produced substantial evidence that BPA disrupts the endocrine system, even at the very small concentrations to which people are typically exposed, and may cause a lengthening list of serious disorders.

Among them are:

• Endocrine system disruption
• Cancer
• Impaired brain function and behavioral abnormalities - http://www.nih.gov/researchmatters/september2008/09292008bpa.htm
• Cardiovascular disease
• Infertility and miscarriage
• Obesity and diabetes
• Asthma
• Resistance to chemotherapy
• Epigenetic and transgenerational effects

A rare human epidemiological study, published in November 2009 in the journal Human Reproduction, offers what its authors called “the first evidence that exposure to BPA in the workplace could have an adverse effect on male sexual dysfunction.”

In 2008, the National Toxicology Program [http://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/releases/2008/bisphenol-a.cfm], an authoritative interagency science panel housed at the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, concluded that BPA may harm the brain, behavior and prostate gland of fetuses, infants and children, even at the low doses to which people are currently exposed. (NTP 2008). NTP officials called for more intensive research on BPA on the grounds that “the possibility that BPA may affect human development cannot be dismissed.”

In response, in October 2009, NIEHS Director Linda Birnbaum targeted $30 million in federal stimulus funds to basic research on BPA and human health - http://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/releases/2009/bisphenol-research.cfm.

Children, African Americans and the poor may face heightened health threats from bisphenol A. The CDC has found average BPA levels 80 percent higher in children ages 6-11 than in adults over 20 (Calafat 2008). These surveys have also detected BPA levels 24 percent higher in people from households with annual incomes under $20,000 versus $45,000 or more, and 11 percent higher among non-Hispanic blacks than whites.

In 2008, citing two industry-sponsored studies, the FDA deemed low-dose BPA exposure safe, even for pregnant women and infants. At the urging of its Science Board and university scientists and independent experts, the agency is now reassessing the safety of BPA in food packaging.

Perchlorate (rocket fuel oxidizer)

Key Findings:

• Found in 9 of 10 cord blood samples. This is just the second study to find perchlorate in American babies; the first was published in September 2009 and reported results from children born in New Jersey.

What is it? - Perchlorate is a rocket fuel oxidizer that powers missiles, the space shuttle, fireworks, road flares, automobile airbags and more.

How does it contaminate cord blood? - It seeps into soil and groundwater because of improper storage and disposal at defense and aerospace facilities and chemical plants. Water utilities in 35 states and territories have found perchlorate in drinking water. The FDA detected perchlorate in 74 percent of 285 popular foods and beverages tested, including baby food.

Health risks - Perchlorate can block the formation of thyroid hormones critical to brain development and growth in the fetus, infants, and children. Inadequate iodine intake increases the risk of perchlorate- related compromise of thyroid hormone production.

Regulatory status - EPA is re-evaluating the need for a national drinking water standard. Massachusetts and California have set standards for maximum perchlorate pollution in drinking water. The FDA has taken no action to address perchlorate contamination of food.

Discussion:

Nine of 10 cord blood samples in the current study tested positive for perchlorate. This is the second study to test U.S. cord blood for perchlorate. In the first, published in September 2009, CDC researchers reported the compound in 67 percent of cord blood samples from 126 babies born in New Jersey (Blount et al 2009).

Perchlorate, a component of rocket fuel integral to the firing systems of missiles and some military explosives, has been found to contaminate drinking water in 28 states and territories. The chemical has seeped into groundwater and soil at military and aerospace sites and chemical plants and has entered the food supply through polluted irrigation water, certain naturally contaminated fertilizers, and other routes not yet identified.

In a national biomonitoring study, CDC detected perchlorate in the urine of all 3,000 people tested (Blount et al 2006a), indicating widespread exposure in the U.S. population. FDA testing has found perchlorate contamination in 74 percent of 285 commonly consumed foods and beverages, including baby food (Murray et al 2008). CDC scientists have found widespread perchlorate contamination of powdered infant formula, especially brands derived from cow’s milk (Schier et al 2009).

Adequate levels of thyroid hormone are critical to brain development and growth of the fetus. A recent large-scale epidemiological study by the CDC found that among women, current perchlorate exposures are associated with significant effects on thyroid hormone levels, especially in those with lower iodine levels (Blount et al 2006b). This is of special concern in women of childbearing age, who may experience perchlorate-associated fluctuations in thyroid hormone levels during pregnancy (EWG 2006).

Perfluorochemicals (PFCs) - Teflon and Scotchgard chemicals

Key findings

• First test in the world for PFBA (C4 or perfluorobutanoic acid) in cord blood; found in 1 of 10 infants.
• PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonate) found in 10 of 10 infants.

What are they? - PFCs are stain- and grease-proofing chemicals.

How do they contaminate cord blood? - used in a variety of consumer products, such as carpets and furniture, as stain and grease repellents, in Teflon cookware, food packaging and clothing. PFCs have also been found in drinking water and certain food groups such as fruits and vegetables.

Health risks - PFCs are linked in human studies to a broad range of health risks, including decreased birth weight, reproductive problems, and elevated cholesterol. In animal studies, PFC exposure has been associated with immune suppression and liver, pancreatic and breast cancers.

Regulatory status - In 2002, 3M Corporation, the world’s major manufacturer of PFOS, completed its voluntary phase-out of the chemical’s production after the EPA raised concerns about its toxicity and widespread detection in human biomonitoring surveys. The EPA is currently developing drinking water standards for both chemicals.

Discussion:

One cord blood sample contained the first-ever finding in cord blood of PFBA, a PFC that appears to be a legacy pollutant. According to the CDC and the EPA, PFBA was last produced in the US in 1998.

This child, the first baby in the world found to be contaminated with this stain- and grease-proofing compound, joins 13 other Americans with PFBA in their blood, according to tests of 75 children and adults sponsored by EWG. Scientists know very little about its possible toxicity.

All 10 cord blood samples in this study tested positive for two members of the PFC family, PFOA and PFOS, confirming CDC studies that found widespread exposure to these chemicals throughout the U.S. population.

PFCs contaminate food, water, wildlife and consumer products and have been detected in every corner of the globe. In the human body, these chemicals are persistent and bioaccumulative and have been found in breast milk.

Researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health tested PFOA and PFOS levels in nearly 300 mother/infant pairs and found that women with elevated blood levels of these chemicals gave birth to infants with reduced birth weight and head circumference (Apelberg 2007). Low birth weight is a predictor of potentially serious medical problems later in life (Lau and Rogers 2004). Other human studies have linked PFC exposure to difficulty conceiving, lower sperm quality and elevated cholesterol (Fei et al 2009, Joensen et al 2009, Steenland et al 2009).

Concerns about PFOS have prompted an end to U.S. production. Manufacturers have agreed to phase out PFOA. EPA administrator Lisa Jackson recently announced that PFCs are one of six chemicals or chemical classes being considered for priority action (EPA 2009). EPA is developing drinking water standards for both chemicals.

Lead

Key findings:

• Lead was found in cord blood of 10 of 10 newborns tested.

What is it? - Lead is a neurotoxic metal that concentrates in the brain.

How does it contaminate cord blood? - Lead contamination occurs primarily as a result of mothers ingesting or breathing dust from chipped lead paint in older homes or drinking tap water containing lead that leaches from old water pipes, lead solder and brass plumbing fixtures.

Health risks - It is a known human neurotoxin believed unsafe in any amount. More than 30 years of studies have demonstrated lead’s dangers to children at lower and lower doses.

Regulatory status - Lead was banned in gasoline and paint decades ago, but many other uses remain. Some states are moving to eliminate lead from consumer goods ranging from wheel weights to cosmetics to children’s products.

Discussion:

All 10 newborns in this study had measurable amounts of lead in their cord blood, consistent with previous studies that have found that babies are often contaminated with this neurotoxic metal before birth.

Lead is one of only a handful of substances whose effects in people have been well studied. The EPA lists a litany of health problems linked to lead, including brain and nervous system damage, behavior and learning problems, hyperactivity, slowed growth, hearing problems, reproductive problems and nerve disorders (EPA 2009a).

Three decades of research have shown clearly that lead damages the human brain. Advances in cognitive and behavioral testing have allowed researchers to discern harm at lower and lower exposures. There is no known safe threshold for exposure.

In February, 2009, researchers at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland, published a study in the journal Neuroepidemiology demonstrating damage to cognitive function in newborns exposed to amounts of lead lower than in any previous study – and lower than the amounts found in several newborns in EWG’s study. The Polish researchers found a strong correlation between lead levels in cord blood at birth and deficits in cognitive performance in 12-, 24- and 36-month-old children. The median level they detected in cord blood was one-tenth of the current U.S. exposure standard for young children (Jedrychowski 2009). The lead levels EWG measured in minority newborns were about half the typical level in the Polish children.

Despite lead’s hazards, a wide range of industries still use it. It is manufactured, imported, processed or used in at least 8,200 facilities in all 50 states, according to company reporting of lead use and emissions in EPA’s 2007 Toxics Release Inventory. Lead-acid batteries -- used in cars, trucks and power supplies for computers, telecommunication networks and hospitals -- account for 88 percent of current lead use, but it also shows up in products such as crystal chandeliers and radiation shields.

For most Americans, lead exposure comes from contaminated drinking water (lead leaches from lead pipes, solder and brass plumbing fixtures) or from dust from chipping paint in older homes. Children living near industrial facilities may face higher exposures.

Americans’ exposures were far higher until the EPA took steps 30 years ago to restrict lead in gasoline and house paint. Subsequently, the number of children exposed to lead above the government’s action level (10 micrograms per deciliter of blood) fell from 87.4 percent to 3.1 percent as of 2001. Public health advocates declared the results a great victory.

Today, some children remain highly exposed, particularly among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans, children from lower socioeconomic groups and immigrants (CDC 2005). A range of consumer products, including many marketed for children, still contain lead. In recent years, lead has been reported in lunch boxes, lipstick, jewelry, window blinds and imported candy.

Mercury

Key findings:

• Total mercury and methylmercury found in 10 of 10 newborns tested.

What is it? - Mercury is a pollutant from coal-fired power plants and other industrial sources, also used in consumer products such as fluorescent light bulbs and thermometers. Mercury in elemental form pollutes waterways. It is readily converted to the organic compound methylmercury, which accumulates in the food chain, especially seafood.

How does it contaminate cord blood? - Eating methylmercury-tainted seafood is typically the primary source of contamination. Mercury dental fillings are a lesser source of contamination.

Health risks - Mercury is a neurotoxin that interferes with brain and nervous system development and is particularly harmful to the fetus, infants and children.

Regulatory status - EPA has set a reference dose (RfD) of 5.8 ppb for mercury levels in the blood of pregnant women. FDA has issued a health advisory urging pregnant women and young children to limit canned tuna consumption and avoid heavily contaminated fish.

Discussion:

Mercury is a naturally occurring element that can be found in some consumer products, notably thermometers, fluorescent lamps and electrodes, and in dental fillings. Coal-fired power plants pollute the air with mercury emissions that enter oceans and rivers, where they are converted to methylmercury and accumulate in fish and wildlife. Fish consumption is the primary route by which the U.S. population is exposed to mercury.

Mercury is a neurotoxin that interferes with brain and nervous system development and is particularly harmful to developing fetuses, infants and children. A growing body of research links consumption of mercury-contaminated fish during pregnancy to abnormal neuro-development in offspring. A European study of 800 mother/child pairs correlated elevated mercury exposure during pregnancy with lower scores on tests that assessed motor function, attention and verbal acuity in offspring (Debes et al 2006).

The U.S. safety standard for methylmercury is 5.8 ppb in blood during pregnancy. This level was established to protect the fetus from mercury’s adverse effects on the brain and nervous system. Although the government has not yet set a safe level to protect non-pregnant adults, the National Academy of Sciences has found that mercury-driven risks for immune disorders and cardiovascular disease may occur at even lower levels than those associated with brain impairment (National Academies Press 2000).

Dioxins and furans (chlorinated and brominated)

Key findings:

• Chlorinated dioxins and furans found in 10 of 10 cord blood samples.
• Brominated dioxins and furans found in 4 of 10 samples.
• First reported detection of hexachlorodibenzodioxin (1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD), octabromodibenzofuran (1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OBDF) and pentabromodibenzodioxin (1,2,3,7,8-PBDF).

What are they? - Dioxins and furans are contaminants in brominated flame retardants used in foam, pads, furniture, and other products. They also occur as byproducts of incineration of plastics treated with brominated flame retardants.

How do they contaminate cord blood? - Dioxins and furans enter the body from contaminated air, food and water.

Health risks - The state of California considers chlorinated dioxins and furans to be known human carcinogens. Animal studies suggest other health risks, including endocrine disruption and immune suppression.

Regulatory status - Most dioxins and furans enter the environment as byproducts of industrial activities. EPA restricts industrial emissions of dioxins and furans. The agency reports that these restrictions have reduced emissions by 90 percent since the 1980’s.

Discussion:

Chlorinated and brominated dioxins and furans pollute the environment as byproducts of incineration and other industrial processes. They have been found in air, soil, food and drinking water. They accumulate in fish and fatty foods such as milk, meats and dairy products. Contaminated food is thought to be the primary route of exposure among Americans.

Animal studies have linked some dioxins and furans to developmental and reproductive toxicity (FDA 2002). German scientists studying 104 mother/child pairs correlated maternal concentrations of chlorinated dioxins and furans with cord blood levels of testosterone and estradiol (Cao 2008) and found that infants born to mothers with elevated blood levels of chlorinated dioxins and furans in breast milk had lower cord blood levels of estradiol and testosterone. Fetuses and infants need adequate levels of testosterone and estradiol for normal reproductive system development.

Polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDEs) brominated fire retardants

Key findings:

• First detection of PBDE-75 and PBDE 181 in cord blood.

What are they? - PBDEs are flame retardants in electronics, fabric, foam, furniture and plastics.

How do they contaminate cord blood? - PBDEs gradually migrate out of consumer products, contaminating house dust. Meat, poultry, dairy products and fish are sometimes contaminated by processing and packaging.

Health risks -- Animal studies have associated PBDEs with disruption of thyroid hormone balance and behavioral changes. PBDEs are considered developmental neurotoxins and can interfere with formation of thyroid hormones critical to fetal and infant brain development.

Regulatroy Status - Two types of PBDEs, octa and penta, have been phased out of use due to toxicity concerns. Another type, deca, is still widely used, but several states are considering restricting its use.

Discussion:

Although octa and penta-PBDEs have been phased out, all 10 cord blood samples in this study tested positive for penta and six of 10 for octa.

The sources of this contamination may be older foam furniture and plastic components of electronics such as televisions and computers manufactured before the phase-out but still in use in many American homes. Some imported products still contain PBDEs.

These chemicals interfere with the thyroid gland, which controls metabolism and growth. Because thyroid hormones control brain development, PBDEs may affect children’s cognitive abilities and behavior. They may also contribute to thyroid disease in adults.

PBDEs accumulate in fatty tissues and can remain in the body for years. They have been found in breast milk. An EWG study tested the blood of 20 mother/child pairs for PBDE and found that on average, each toddler had three times the PBDE levels of his or her mother. Investigators theorize that the children ingested more PBDE-tainted house dust as they played on the floor and placed their hands and toys into their mouths (EWG 2008).

In 2003, European authorities banned two of the most toxic PBDE commercial mixtures because of concerns over their ubiquity in human blood and breast milk: penta (predominantly containing chemicals called PBDE-99 and PBDE-47) and octa (predominantly comprising PBDE-183). In 2005, U.S. manufacturers stopped selling penta and octa, but furniture and other goods permeated with these substances can still be found in many U.S. homes.

Deca-PBDE continues to be in widespread use in the U.S. Deca shares some toxicity characteristics of penta and octa and can break down into those chemicals. Maine and Washington have restricted deca use, and similar bills have been introduced in several other state legislatures.

PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyl ethers)

Key findings:

• PCBs found in all 10 newborns tested.
• First reported detection in U.S. newborns of five PCBs - PCB-7, PCB-43, PCB-55, PCB-144, PCB- 181. Testing also detected three PCB mixtures: PCB-134/143, PCB-107-124, PCB-139-140.

What are they? - There are more than 200 PCB chemicals. Some are thin, light-colored liquids, others are yellow or black waxy solids. PCBs have been used in many industrial applications, including as transformer insulators and fire retardants, and in pesticides, paints, plastics and caulk. Manufacturers made more than 1 billion pounds between 1929 and 1976, when Congress passed legislation effectively banning PCBs. EPA classifies PCBs as probable human carcinogens, and many studies have shown that they damage the developing brain.

How do PCB's contaminate cord blood? - primarily through food. PCBs enter the food chain in various ways, including migration from packaging, contamination of animal feed and accumulation in fatty tissues of animals.

Health risks - PCBs have been classified as probable carcinogens and are known to be toxic to the immune, nervous and endocrine systems.

Regulatory status - Although Congress voted to ban PCB’s in 1976, they are still found in older electrical equipment, in soil, air and water, in toxic waste sites and in some meat.

Discussion:

The United States banned the manufacture of polychlorinated biphenyl ethers (PCBs) in 1979, but these once-widely used, man-made and highly persistent organic chemicals continue to be found in the environment worldwide. EWG’s cord blood study found PCBs in all 10 minority newborns tested.

PCBs are synthetic chemicals formerly used in electrical, heat transfer and hydraulic equipment; as plasticizers in paints, plastics, and rubber products; and in many other industrial products (EPA 2009b). In the United States, more than 1 billion pounds of PCBs were produced from 1929 until they were banned under the Toxic Substances Control Act in 1976.

Due to their extensive use and uncontrolled disposal, PCBs still contaminate waterways and soils, the food supply and people’s bodies. They are found in older electrical transformers, capacitors and coolers (EPA 2009c). The EPA is struggling to deal with PCB-containing equipment and multiple hazardous waste sites that leach PCBs. The chemicals have been found in at least 500 of the 1,598 hazardous waste sites identified by the EPA (ATSDR 2000).

Since the 1970s, scientists have been aware of PCB toxicity to the immune, nervous, and endocrine systems. Animals exposed to PCBs develop liver cancer. In occupational studies, workers exposed to PCBs had increased mortality from several kinds of cancer, including of the liver and biliary tract. The EPA and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have declared that PCBs are probably carcinogenic to humans (ATSDR 2000). In recently published human studies, PCBs have been also associated with an elevated risk of breast (Brody 2007) and prostate cancer (Prins 2008), possibly due to effects on the hormonal system and interference with estrogen signaling (Wolff 2008). Three animal studies published this year indicated that low levels of PCB exposure may have greater health effects than higher exposures. Those studies found that low doses hampered animals’ ability to swim a maze (Lein et al 2007) and that exposures increased the “excitability” of neurons (Pessah 2009) and interfered with cell-to-cell signaling in the brain (Yang et al 2009).

Food is the main source of exposure for the general population. PCBs enter the food chain by migrating from packaging materials, by contaminating animal feed, by accumulating in the fatty tissues of animals and by other means. Mothers can transfer PCBs to their infants via breast milk (CDC 2005).

PCB levels in human serum (blood) have been declining since the 1970s, according to studies by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Sjodin 2004), but the majority of Americans are still contaminated (CDC 2005; Herbstman 2007) at levels that can have subtle and insidious long-term effects on health, especially for newborns and developing fetuses.

EWG’s tests of umbilical cord blood samples found PCB concentrations of 6.2 ng/g on a lipid basis. Scientists from the Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School have reported that at these concentrations, PCBs are associated with decreased alertness, responsiveness and other attention-associated behavioral measures in infants, including effects on self-quieting and motor control (Sagiv 2009).

Other major epidemiology studies have consistently found that infants and children with higher PCB exposures score lower on numerous measures of neurological function.

Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), brominated fire retardant

Key findings:

• Found in 3 of 10 cord blood samples.

What is it? - TBBPA is a fire retardant found in electronics, carpet padding and plastic casings for televisions and computers. TBBPA can break down into the plastics chemical bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic estrogen.

How does it contaminate cord blood? - TBBPA is released from electronics and plastics over time. Consumption of contaminated food and, to a lesser extent, house dust contribute to human exposure.

Health risks -- can disrupt thyroid hormone balance. Preliminary studies suggest that it may disrupt the immune system.

Regulatroy Status - TBBPA use is unrestricted in the U.S.

Discussion:

Three of 10 cord blood samples in the current study had measurable amounts of the fire retardant tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in cord blood, the first report of the chemical in American newborns. More than 70 percent of electrical and electronic appliances worldwide contain TBBPA bonded to circuit boards or impregnated in plastic (BSEF 2008).

Because of the chemical’s prevalence in consumer products, it is implicated in widespread pollution of people and the environment. Scientists have detected it in sewage sludge in Sweden, human fat in New York City residents, breast milk and cord blood in France, in North Sea sediments and in dolphins and sharks from Florida’s coastal waters (Cariou et al 2008, Talsness et al 2009).

Little is known about the dangers of TBBPA. In a 2009 review, scientists noted, “There are only a few published studies regarding the toxicology of TBBPA (Talsness et al 2009).

The most consistent toxicity data links TBBPA exposure to thyroid disruption (NIEHS 2009). Some animal studies link TBBPA to adverse effects on the immune and reproductive systems, but the implications for human health are unclear (Birnbaum 2006, Van der Ven 2008). TBBPA can degrade into BPA, an endocrine-disrupting chemical considered a major priority for U.S. researchers.

Tonalide and Galaxolide Musk Fragrances

Key findings:

• Tonalide and/or Galaxolide found in 7 of 10 cord blood samples tested.

What are they? - Tonalide and Galaxolide are synthetic fragrances that mimic musk odor from endangered Asian musk deer. They are members of a large family of natural and synthetic compounds.

How do musks contaminate blood? - Industry uses 9,000 tons of synthetic musks annually worldwide. People absorb musks through the skin, from soap, cosmetics and clothes washed with scented detergent, and by inhalation from perfumes and cologne sprays. Musks contaminate rivers, pollute fish, concentrate in body fat and persist in tissues long after exposure.

Health risks - unknown. Safety in people has never been studied. A few lab studies, which require confirmation, suggest Tonalide and Galaxolide disrupt hormones and damage organisms’ defenses, allowing more toxins to seep into body cells. Musks cling to fat in human blood and breast milk (Washam 2005).

Regulatory status - The industry is in rapid transition, perhaps responding to growing evidence of environmental and health risks from older musks. Tonalide is still in widespread use, but Galaxolide is in decline. At least two new musks, Habanolide and Helvetolide, appeared on the market around 2005. Habanolide is now among at least seven widely used musks never tested in people.

Discussion:

EWG’s minority cord blood study produced the first documentation of Tonalide and Galaxolide, synthetic musk fragrances, in American babies. Cord blood from 7 of 10 infants tested positive for at least one synthetic musk. Six of 10 samples contained Galaxolide, 4 of 10 contained Tonalide, and three contained both.

Natural and synthetic musk fragrances have a characteristic animal-like scent originally taken from the glands of the Asian musk deer. Many synthetic musks are used to “fix” scented products, slowing down the release of fragrance molecules and extending product life. Some cling to fabric and are used in laundry detergent.

Galaxolide and Tonalide were invented in the 1950s. They became popular in the 1980s when older musks fell out of use because of questions about their toxicity and persistence in the environment. Galaxolide has been produced or imported in quantities of between 1 million and 10 million pounds annually for the past decade. Tonalide was produced or imported in amounts of up to 10 million pounds in 1997, but industry has not reported manufacturing or importing it since then (EPA 2006).

Little is known about the safety of Tonalide and Galaxolide, particularly for exposures in the womb. Recent research has raised environmental concerns. Both are ubiquitous in wastewater and rivers and are toxic to aquatic life. Scientists from the Technical University of Denmark placed small crustaceans called copepods in water contaminated with tiny amounts of Tonalide, Galaxolide and other musks and reported that, “Since the synthetic musks strongly inhibited larval development… at low nominal concentrations, they should be considered as very toxic” (Wollenberger 2003). Their findings and others have overturned presumptions of safety for synthetic musks.

Because of growing concerns over polycyclic musks like Tonalide and Galaxolide, the market is shifting and macrocyclic musks like helvetolide and habanolide are coming into widespread use. Some are now used in amounts exceeding 1 million pounds annually (EPA 2006). They are poorly tested and have never been monitored in human tissues.

Polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs)

Key findings:

• Found in 10 of 10 cord blood samples tested.
• First detection of PCNs 9, 13, 63

What are they? - found in wood preservatives, varnishes and industrial lubricants and as a byproduct of waste incineration.

How do they contaminate cord blood? - PCNs pollute the environment and have been found in air, sewage sludge, soil, wildlife and fish.

Health risks - Occupational exposure to PCNs has been associated with liver cirrhosis. Animal studies suggest that PCNs may disrupt hormone systems.

Regulatroy Status - PPCNs were phased out of production starting in the late 1970’s due to toxicity concerns but still enter the environment as a byproduct of waste incineration.

Discussion:

Polychlorinated naphthalenes were found in all 10 cord blood samples in this study. Structurally similar to dioxins, they accumulate in fatty tissue. They have been found to contaminate breast milk. A study of workers subjected to high concentrations of PCNs found higher risk of liver disease, especially cirrhosis, after just two years of exposure (Ward 1994). No studies have been conducted of health effects of long term, low level PCN exposure in humans.

Although PCNs were phased out of major production more than 30 years ago, small amounts are still produced for specific industrial applications. Many PCNs persist in the environment for years. The major source of ongoing environmental contamination is waste incineration.

Chemical Mixtures

Biomonitoring research such as EWG’s minority cord blood study show that real world exposures do not occur chemical by chemical. Rather, each of us encounters complex mixtures of chemicals. Many of these compounds are associated with a myriad of toxicities. There are little or no data on how chemical mixtures may affect human health.

For example, EWG found 191 individual chemicals in cord blood from Anonymous Newborn #1. Testing each possible combination of these chemicals at a single dose -- first testing them singly and then in pairs, triplets, quadruplets, all the way up to 191 -- would entail a number of tests equal to 649 times 10 to the 30^th power. This is nearly a billion times more than the estimated number of stars in the universe (ESA 2009).

It’s no wonder, then, that science has yet to understand how chemical mixtures affect our health. New paradigms for studying mixture toxicity may hold greater promise.

THE MIXING BOWL: Newborns are contaminated with an average of more than 100 chemicals known or suspected to cause cancer, birth defects or otherhealth problems.

Source: EWG compilation of chemical classifications published by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Environmental Protection Agency, the European Union Consumer Products Safety and Quality Unit, the International Agency for Research on Carcinogens (IARC) and neurotoxin listings from academic review published in the journal Lancet (references).

Traditional toxicology testing has involved evaluating one chemical at a time at various concentrations to determine its effects on various biological endpoints. Although toxicologists have been aware for decades of the risks posed by exposure to mixtures of chemicals, a 1992 literature review of 151 toxicology papers calculated that 95 percent focused on single chemicals.

Since then, interest in chemical mixtures has grown. Government agencies such as the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) have convened programs and conferences on this topic. Federal agencies have also started to develop initiatives to help guide researchers studying health effects of chemical exposures (Monosson 2005).

Linda Birnbaum Ph.D., Director of the NIEHS, has called for more research into the impact on human health of mixtures of environmental chemicals. “Some chemicals may act in an additive fashion,” she told a Columbia University audience in March 2009. “When we look one compound at a time, we may miss the boat.”

In all, EWG’s biomonitoring studies have tested nearly 200 individuals (cord blood from newborns and blood and urine samples from older children and adults) for 552 chemicals and have detected up to 493. (The number ranged from 414 to 493 because laboratories could not distinguish between some congeners.)

EWG’s new cord blood study amplifies our understanding that the developing fetus is exposed to complex mixtures of potential neurotoxins, endocrine disruptors and carcinogens. Among the chemicals found by EWG are known neurotoxins such as lead and methylmercury, probable endocrine disruptors such as bisphenol A and perchlorate and suspected carcinogens such as PFOA and deca PBDE.

Recent animal studies support the theory that exposures to mixtures of chemicals often result in more significant adverse effects than single chemical exposures. For example, researchers from the Technical University of Denmark and University of London looked at the effects of four hormone disruptors, individually and in combination, on the reproductive systems of male rats. They found that “the effect of combined exposure to the selected chemicals on malformations of external sex organs was synergistic, and the observed responses were greater than would be predicted from the toxicities of the individual chemicals” (Christiansen et al 2009). Researchers at the University of California found that exposure to combinations of pesticides resulted in higher mortality rates among tadpoles than occurred with individual pesticide exposures (Hayes et al).

Physicians know they should scrutinize potential drug interactions closely before starting patients on new medications. Medications in combination can interact with one another, resulting in toxicities that might not occur if they were administered individually. Similarly, environmentally-acquired chemicals may interact to produce toxicities. In addition, exposure to mixtures of chemicals that have similar biological effects or mechanisms of action may result in cumulative or synergistic toxicity.

Epigenetics

Research teams around the world are exploring the mechanisms by which environmental pollutants may trigger genetic changes that can affect a person’s health and that, in some cases, may be passed on to future generations.

EWG intends to share its biomonitoring findings with researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health, including projects under the aegis of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Program [http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/epigenomics/], which plans to distribute $62 million over the next five years [http://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/releases/2009/nih-funds-grantees.cfm] for basic research on “epigenetic changes,” meaning “chemical modifications to genes that result from diet, aging, stress, or environmental exposures [that] define and contribute to specific human diseases and biological processes.”

In September, NIH awarded 22 grants to researchers exploring epigenetic aspects of glaucoma, Alzheimer’s disease, hypertension, autism, mental illness, breast cancer, lupus and other serious conditions. Some research under this initiative is investigating how BPA alters body chemistry at the genetic level.

The National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, meanwhile, has designated BPA a top research priority [http://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/releases/2009/bisphenol-research.cfm] and has announced plans to spend $30 million over the next two years to study the chemical’s impact on human health and the environment. The BPA program is part of a larger NIEHSbacked effort to broaden and deepen scientific understanding of what scientists call the “developmental basis of disease.”

Another promising line of research is focusing on environmental factors behind the epidemic of childhood asthma. An April 2009 study by researchers from the Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health and University of Cincinnati [http://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsletter/2009/april/study-links.cfm] produced evidence that New York City children exposed in utero to high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from vehicular emissions were more likely to develop asthma than other children. The study involved 700 children born to mothers living in traffic-congested New York neighborhoods. By monitoring prenatal air pollution exposures and collecting cord blood and fetal placental tissue, researchers reported a “positive and significant association” among children with asthma between their mothers’ high PAH exposures during pregnancy and structural changes called “methylation” in a particular gene under investigation as an epigenetic marker for asthma.

Ultimately, EWG believes that by directing research toward causes and prevention, instead of focusing solely on treatment, scientists may someday be able to avert incalculable human suffering.

Proving Harm at Low Doses

Confronted with studies documenting that hundreds of industrial chemicals are present in the human body, chemical manufacturers and their leading trade association, the American Chemistry Council, resort to the blanket qualifier: the “mere presence of a chemical” does not prove harm. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention uses similar language in reporting its own biomonitoring data.

Mere presence does not prove harm, but studies often do. EWG reviewed the published scientific literature relating to cord blood contaminants detected in the current study. Seven relevant studies published between 1997 and 2009 tested 2,151 newborns for six chemicals or chemical families also detected in the current study: mercury, lead, PBDEs, PCBs, PFOS and PFOA. All these studies found that babies with higher exposures were more likely to experience health problems at birth or later in childhood, including low birth weight, damaged hearing or intelligence deficits.

Three animal studies published in 2009 indicated that low levels of PCB exposure may have greater health effects than larger exposures. The studies produced evidence that low doses hampered animals’ ability to swim a maze (Lein 2009), increased the “excitability” of neurons (Pessah 2009) and interfered with cell-to-cell signaling in the brain (Pessah 2009).

In a scientific statement on endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) issued in 2009, The Endocrine Society said: “There are several properties of EDCs that have caused controversy. First, even infinitesimally low levels of exposure — indeed, any level of exposure at all — may cause endocrine or reproductive abnormalities, particularly if exposure occurs during a critical developmental window. Surprisingly, low doses may even exert more potent effects than higher doses. Second, EDCs may exert non-traditional dose-response curves, such as inverted-U or U-shaped curves. Both of these concepts have been known for hormone and neurotransmitter actions, but only in the past decade have they begun to be appreciated for EDCs” (Endocrine Society 2009).

Studies find trace chemical exposure in cord blood associated with mental and physical effects at birth and later in childhood.

Cord Blood Contamination and Associated Health Effects

Descriptions of Studies Showing Health Harm Related to Cord Blood Pollutants

Scotchgard (PFOS, or perfluorooctane sulfonate) - Apelberg (2007)

Scientists at Johns Hopkins University studied the relationship between cord blood concentration of Teflon (PFOA) and Scotchgard (PFOS) and birth weight, head circumference and gestational age in 293 infants born in Baltimore, Md. They found that newborns with higher exposures to PFOA and PFOS had statistically significant decreases in head circumference and birth weight compared to those who had lower cord blood concentrations of the chemicals (Apelberg 2007). Compared to newborns with 3.4 ppb of PFOS (the 25^th percentile) in their cord blood, infants with 7.9 ppb of PFOS (the 75^th percentile) had a 0.27 cm (0.8 percent) decrease from mean head circumference, a 58 g (1.8 %) decrease from mean body weight and 0.062 (2.4%) decrease from mean Ponderal Index (a measure of body size, expressed in g/cm³ x 100). Lower birth weight and smaller head circumference at birth are associated with greater susceptibility to chronic diseases later in life and effects on intelligence (Lau 2004; Schlotz 2009). [Full ref. Lau C, Rogers JM. 2004. Embryonic and fetal programming of physiological disorders in adulthood. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 72(4): 300-12. Schlotz W, Phillips DI. 2009. Fetal origins of mental health: evidence and mechanisms. Brain Behav Immun 23(7): 905-16.]

Teflon (PFOA, or Perfluorooctanoic acid) – Apelberg (2007)

This study by scientists at Johns Hopkins University is described above (Abelberg 2007). Compared to infants with up to 1.2 ppb (the 25^th percentile) PFOA in their cord blood, newborns with 2.1 ppb of PFOA (the 75^th percentile) had a 0.23 cm (0.6%) decrease from mean head circumference, a 58 g (1.8%) decrease from mean body weight and a 0.039 (1.5%) decrease from mean Ponderal Index (a measure of body size, expressed in g/cm³ x 100).

Lead (Jedrychowski 2009)

Lead is an extensively studied neurotoxicant whose adverse effects on cognitive performance are well established. A new study published this year found that extremely low levels of lead in cord blood are associated with impaired cognition in young children (Jedrychowski 2009). Polish researchers found a strong connection between levels of lead in cord blood at birth in 444 children and cognitive performance when they reached 12, 24 and 36 months of age. The researchers used the standard Bayley Scales of Infant Development MDI test, which measures habituation, problem solving, early number concepts, generalization, classification, memory, vocalization, language and social skills. The median level in cord blood was one-tenth the current U.S. standard for young children. The lead levels we measure in minority newborns were about half of the typical level in the Polish children. Researchers found a decline in cognitive function of about 6 points on the Bayley Mental Development Index for every 10-fold increase in cord blood level concentrations.

Methylmercury (Debes 2006)

Researchers at Harvard University and the Faroese Hospital System, Faroe Islands, Denmark, measured mercury concentrations in cord blood, cord tissue and maternal hair in 878 mother-child pairs at birth and correlated prenatal mercury exposure with performance on neurobehavioral tests at ages seven and 14. The researchers found that infants with higher exposure to mercury during the prenatal period had lower scores on the tests, which assessed motor function, attention and verbal acuity compared with newborns who had lower exposures (Debes 2006). Mercury has long been established as a neurotoxin, especially when exposure occurs during pregnancy. In the U.S., exposure to mercury occurs primarily through consumption of contaminated seafood.

Mercury (Grandjean 1997)

Scientists at Odense University, Denmark studied a group of 917 seven-year-old children in the Faroe Islands The study found that mercury concentrations of 46-79 ppb in maternal blood were associated with doubling of the number of children who perform below the 5th percentile for neruropsychological effects (Grandjean 1997).

PCBs (Herbstman 2008)

Scientists at Columbia and Johns Hopkins universities measured levels of cord blood thyroid hormone at birth relative to levels of PCBs and PBDEs in 297 newborns delivered at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore). Researchers found that infants with higher cord blood concentrations of PCBs and PBDEs had statistically significant decreases in thyroid hormone levels compared with newborns who had lower levels of these two classes of chemical pollutants (Herbstman 2008). Adequate thyroid hormone levels during pregnancy and infancy are necessary for normal brain development; research has shown that even minor decreases in thyroid hormone levels during these critical periods can have long-term ill effects (Zoeller 2002, Ginsberg 2007).

PBDEs (Herbstman 2008)

This study by scientists at Johns Hopkins University and Columbia University is described above (Herbstman 2008). Researchers found that newborns with higher cord blood concentrations of PBDEs and PCBs had statistically significant decreases in thyroid hormone levels compared with those who had lower levels of these two classes of chemical pollutants. These associations occurred only in infants born by spontaneous vaginal delivery; other birth modes result in stress-induced changes in thyroid hormone levels, thereby potentially masking effects associated with PBDEs. Adequate thyroid hormone levels during pregnancy and infancy are necessary for normal brain development; research has shown that even minor decreases in thyroid hormone levels during these critical periods can have long-term ill effects (Zoeller 2002, Ginsberg 2007). The newborns in EWG’s cord blood study had slightly lower PBDE levels than infants in the Baltimore study. PBDEs were widely used as flame retardants in consumer products. The two most commonly used forms, Octa and Penta, are now banned in the U.S., but Deca PBDE is still in widespread use. PCBs were banned in the 1970’s due to their toxicity and persistence in organisms and the environment.

PCBs (Sagiv 2008)

A study by scientists at the Harvard School of Public Health has strengthened the link between fetal exposure to PCBs and behavioral effects in childhood, such as inattention. Study participants were 542 infants from a birth cohort whose mothers resided adjacent to a PCB-contaminated harbor in New Bedford, Mass. between 1993 and 1998. Researchers found that serum PCB levels above the median of 0.3 ppb (on a total serum basis) were associated with decreased alertness, responsiveness and other attention-associated behavioral measures, including self-quieting and motor control in infants tested two weeks after birth. The authors stated that this observation was “particularly notable given … the low-level PCB exposure in [the] study population” (Sagiv 2008).

Vulnerability Early in Life

During pregnancy, the placenta transfers nutrients from the mother’s circulation to the fetus and returns waste products from the fetus to the mother to be excreted. Numerous studies have shown that the placenta does not, as once thought, shield the fetus from chemicals and pesticides carried in the mother’s body (Barr 2007, EWG 2005, Bearer 1995, Guvenius 2003, Tittlemier 2004, Sandau 2002).

In utero exposures are particularly worrisome because of the unique vulnerabilities of the fetus (Grandjean and Landrigan 2006). Studies have shown that exposure to toxic chemicals during critical windows of development can result in permanent and irreversible brain and organ damage (Barr 2007).

There are several reasons for the greater vulnerability of the developing fetus:

• A developing child’s chemical exposures are greater pound-for-pound than those of adults.
• The blood-brain barrier, which prevents many harmful substances from entering the brain, is not fully developed until after birth (Rodier 1995).
• The fetus cannot detoxify and excrete many chemicals as completely as an adult (Birnbaum 2003).
• The blood-brain barrier, which prevents many harmful substances from entering the brain, is not fully developed until after birth (Rodier 1995).
• The fetus cannot detoxify and excrete many chemicals as completely as an adult (Birnbaum 2003).
• Fetal blood contains lower levels of some proteins that bind to harmful chemicals and neutralize them. As a result, fetal blood can contain higher levels of unbound, biologically active chemicals than the mother’s blood (Koren 1990).
• The fetus undergoes rapid cell division, proliferation and differentiation in utero, making its developing cells particularly sensitive to chemical exposures (Birnbaum 2003).

Fetal exposures to industrial chemicals can result in immediate harm to the developing brain and other organ systems, but some adverse effects may not manifest themselves for years or decades. Scientists refer to this phenomenon as the “fetal basis of adult disease,” a term coined by British researcher David Barker. He found that newborns malnourished during pregnancy had higher rates of heart disease and diabetes later in life than well-fed infants(NIEHS 2008).

This phenomenon has also been seen as a result of chemical exposures, including to mercury (NIEHS 2008). Scientists now consider it prudent to assume that the environment in which the fetus develops has long-term health repercussions and that harmful exposures during pregnancy can lincrease the later incidence of certain diseases or medical conditions (Basha 2005, Anway 2005).

Minority Children and Chemical Risks

Minority communities often experience high exposures to toxic chemicals

The newborns in the current study are anonymous, and we have no evidence that they were born into homes and neighborhoods with unique amounts of contaminants. But a large body of research has found that certain minority groups are at particular risk from chemical exposures, simply because of where they live or work.

A number of body burden studies have identified “hot spots” -- polluted communities -- where residents have elevated levels of industrial chemicals. CDC’s massive NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) survey series, which examines pollution exposures in the general population, has identified some general differences in pollution exposures for racial and ethnic groups. Academic studies have also investigated this issue.

Some notable trends:

• African American children ages one to five have 64 percent higher geometric mean levels of lead exposure than white children. They were also 2.8 times more likely to have elevated blood lead levels than white or Mexican American children (3.4 percent vs. 1.2 percent) (Jones 2009).
• Mercury levels in women of childbearing age are highest for Asian American, Native American, Pacific Islander, and Caribbean (Hispanic Black) populations, with many more women of childbearing age exceeding health-based levels (Mahaffey 2009).

Farmers and farm workers, who in the U.S. are often Latino, have higher exposures to a variety of pesticides, including some that can impair brain development. Children born to women in agricultural communities have high levels of pesticide exposures in utero. (Eskenazi 2008).

African Americans and Mexican Americans have higher levels of two phthalates than non-Hispanic whites. Phthalates are widely used in consumer and personal care products.

Mexican Americans have higher levels of PBDE-47, a fire retardant (Sjodin 2008).

There are several important reasons why minority populations, especially those living in poorer communities, experience higher exposures to environmental pollutants. For one thing, hazardous waste sites and other polluting facilities are more likely to be deliberately placed near communities of color and low-income communities than near more affluent neighborhoods (Brulle and Pellow 2006).

The sociologist Robert Bullard noted in his watershed book Dumping in Dixie that communities of color are deliberately and consistently sought out for toxic dumping. The proximity of these toxic facilities can result in heavily polluted local environments. Residents of “fenceline” communities, so-called because they border toxic industrial facilities, are often exposed to outsized concentrations of pollutants.

Some minority populations reside in poorer urban neighborhoods that are congested and close to busy roads. Their homes may be older and deteriorating and have pest infestations. Exposure to lead, indoor and outdoor air pollutants and soil pollutants have all been found to be higher in minority populations who live in congested urban neighborhoods (Frumkin 2005).

Some minority groups are also exposed to toxic chemicals through employment in hazardous industries. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) reports that 84 percent of the 2 million U.S. farm workers are of Latino heritage. Many of these workers are Spanish speakers and cannot understand English instructions on the proper use and disposal of chemicals. Others lack protective gear. Many workers fear retribution if they report violations of laws governing occupational hazards.

Some farm workers unintentionally expose their families to toxic chemicals by coming home wearing clothing contaminated with pesticides (NIOSH). In addition, the National Center for Farmworker Health estimates that up to 300,000 children are directly employed in the agricultural sector every year (NCFH).

EPA estimates that there are currently 155,000 nail salon workers in the U.S., the majority of whom are Asian women, especially of Vietnamese origin. The nail polishes and solvents used in these salons often contain known endocrine disruptors and carcinogens. Many salon owners do not provide adequate protective gear and ventilation (EPA 2008). Surveys of nail salon workers have found that they experienced more rashes, headaches and breathing problems after they began working at the salons (Quach 2008).

Residents of urban neighborhoods often lack access to high-quality, affordable fresh fruits and vegetables. Many of these neighborhoods often only have small markets that stock processed foods, alcohol and tobacco products. (Frumkin 2005).

Dr. Jane Hightower of the California Pacific Medical Center and coauthors found that 27 percent of study participants who self-identified as Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American or multiracial had elevated mercury levels, while only 10.8 percent of participants from other ethic groups had unsafe levels.

The primary source of mercury exposure in the U.S. is contaminated seafood. High mercury levels, especially during pregnancy, affect the development of the brain and nervous system. In adults, high mercury levels have been associated with cardiac disease and neurological problems (Hightower 2006).

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Environmental Oncology have found that African American women use more personal care products that contain hormone disruptors than other populations. The researchers hypothesized that these products may contribute to decreasing age of puberty and increased rates of pre-menopausal breast cancer among African American girls and women (Donovan 2007).

It is clear that minority populations in the U.S. have higher exposures to many chemical pollutants. In recognition of the growing problem of environmental inequality, in 1994 President Clinton issued Executive Order 12898, requiring federal agencies to incorporate environmental justice considerations into their programs.

But that initiative withered once Clinton left office. A 2004 report by the EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG) concluded that during the Bush administration, the agency had failed to consider environmental justice issues sufficiently when setting policies and regulations (EPA 2004).

In a 2006 report, the OIG recommended that the EPA conduct environmental justice reviews of its existing programs and develop protocols to “make environmental justice policies a priority” (Obama- Biden 2008). In November 2009, EPA Administator Lisa Jackson recruited two seasoned advisors to advance the adgency’s environmental justice and civil rights agenda.

FAQ

1. Why have you tested minority cord blood?

   This is EWG’s second cord blood study. Our first cord blood study, released in 2005, involved 10 newborns whose demographic information was unknown. In this study, we focused on children from minority communities because of the dearth of biomonitoring studies of these populations. To our knowledge, this is the first study that tests for such a large number chemicals in cord blood from infants African American, Latino, and Asian heritage. The purpose of this study was to make sure that racial and ethnic minority communities are considered as we explore the impacts of pollution in people.

2. Can I have my own baby's cord blood tested?

   With a few exceptions, commercial laboratories do not offer cord blood testing for individuals. Your physician may be able to have your child’s cord blood tested for lead and a few other common pollutants. But extensive tests such as we have commissioned are done only for scientific studies. You can contact a nearby university to find out if you can enroll your child’s cord blood in a scientific study.

3. Can I test my own body for chemicals?

   Most commercial laboratories do not offer biomonitoring tests for chemicals. The exceptions are lead and mercury. Your physician may be able to arrange testing for those chemicals. You can inquire about enrolling yourself in a scientific study.

4. Lead is very dangerous to developing bodies? How can I have my children tested for lead?

   Ask your pediatrician when to test children for lead and how to interpret the test results.

5. How can I protect myself and my family from chemicals?

   Limit your exposure to toxic chemicals (check out our Healthy Home Tips to find out how). We invite you to join us in our fight for policies that restrict harmful chemicals in the environment. Policy reform is the most permanent, cost-effective and fair way to protect our health. Visit our action page to learn more.

6. How did you pick chemicals to be targeted by your tests?

   We focused on pesticides, industrial pollutants and chemicals typically found in consumer products, food and water. Some, like PCBs, have been banned for decades but persist in the environment. We looked for some chemicals, like bisphenol A and perchlorate, that have been detected in most Americans over age 6 and that pose a special danger to the fetus and newborn.

7. Why did you limit your tests to 10 subjects?

   Studies of chemicals in human tissues are expensive. Our laboratory costs alone were almost $7,000 per sample. The methods are highly specialized and few laboratories have the technical expertise to run the analyses. Many cord blood studies often have fewer than 20 study participants.

   From this study, we conclude that a random sampling of umbilical cord blood from 10 American newborns of African American, Latino and Asian heritage was contaminated with 175 to 232 of 383 possible chemicals. This study is the first to detect BPA, polycyclic musks and a few other chemicals in U.S. cord blood samples.

8. Why are in utero chemical exposures so significant?

   During pregnancy, the placenta transfers nutrients from the mother to the fetus and moves fetal waste to the mother, who excretes them. Numerous studies show that the placenta does not, as once thought, shield the developing fetus from the hundreds of industrial chemicals and pesticides with which the mother comes in contact.

   In-utero contamination is particularly worrisome because of the unique vulnerabilities of the developing fetus (Grandjean 2008).

   • The blood-brain barrier, a protective mechanism that prevents many harmful chemicals from entering the human brain, is not fully developed until after birth (Rodier 1995).
   • The developing fetus cannot detoxify and excrete many chemicals as completely as a mature body (Birnbaum 2003).
   • The fetus undergoes rapid cellular division, proliferation and differentiation, during which processes its cells are particularly susceptible to chemical exposures

   Exposure to toxic industrial chemicals during critical windows of development can result in permanent and irreversible brain and organ damage (Grandjean 2008, Barr 2007).

9. How and when is the mother exposed to these chemicals?

   More than 80,000 commercial chemicals are approved for use in the U.S., a number that grows by 2,500 new chemicals yearly (EPA 1997). U.S. industries produce or import 3,000 of these substances in quantities of greater than one million pounds per year (EPA 2005c). Many pesticides banned in the U.S. for decades persist in the environment, build up in the food chain and continue to contribute to daily exposures (PCBs and DDT, for example). Government sources detail more than 3,000 chemicals used as food additives (FDA 2005), an estimated 10,500 ingredients in personal care products (FDA 2000), and more than 500 chemicals approved as active ingredients in pesticides (EPA 2002a,2005b).

   Many of these chemicals, whether used purposefully or unwanted impurities, can contribute to a person's body burden through exposures from food, air, water, dust, soil and consumer products.

10. What are the implications of chemical exposures for human health?

    For many chemicals in our bodies, the health consequences are unknown. Studies aren't required under federal law and in most cases haven't been done.

11. What steps can women who are pregnant or planning to be pregnant take to reduce any adverse effects on their children?

    Some exposure to pesticides, industrial chemicals and environmentally persistent pollutants are unavoidable. But some are.

    Some tips:

    • Eat fewer processed foods, because they often contain chemical additives.
    • Eat organic produce.
    • Don't microwave food in plastic containers. Use glass or ceramics.
    • Filter your tap water.
    • Eat fewer meat and high-fat dairy products.
    • Use fewer cosmetics and other personal care products.
    • Avoid artificial fragrances.
    • Don't use stain repellants on clothing, bedding or upholstery.
    • Use fewer strong household cleaners, more soap and water.
    • Use manual or electric yard tools instead of gasoline-powered models.
    • Avoid gasoline fumes when you're filling your car.
    • Eat seafood known to be low in PCB and mercury contamination, such as wild Alaska salmon and canned salmon. Avoid canned tuna — it contains mercury.

    If you're pregnant, ask someone in your household to take over household cleaning and pumping gas. Don’t paint the baby’s room while you’re expecting. Don't use nail polish.

    For more specifics, sign up to get our Healthy Home Tips in your inbox.

12. Will infants born with contaminants in their bodies shed them?

    That depends. Some chemicals like perchlorate have very short half lives and exit the human body very quickly, but other chemicals like lead have longer half lives and may persist months or even years.

11 Healthy Pregnancy Tips

Pregnancy is a critical time. A mother’s chemical exposures can adversely affect her baby in many ways. Here are some simple but important steps you can take to reduce the risks during pregnancy - and beyond.

1. Go organic and eat fresh foods

   Recent studies show that a woman’s exposure to pesticides during pregnancy can permanently decrease her child’s IQ and memory. Avoid contact with pesticides during pregnancy. Fruits and veggies are important, so eat organic and use EWG's Shoppers Guide to Pesticides to determine which conventionally-grown crops have the least pesticide residues. Choose milk and meat produced without added growth hormones. Limit canned food, since can linings usually contain the synthetic estrogen called bisphenol A (BPA).

2. Drink safer water

   It's important for pregnant women to drink plenty of water. Use a reverse osmosis system or carbon filter pitcher to reduce your exposure to impurities such as chlorine, perchlorate and lead. Skip bottled water, which costs more and isn't necessarily better, and filter your tap water. If you're out and about, use a stainless steel, glass or BPA-free plastic reusable container. Mix infant formula with fluoride-free water. Get EWG's Safe Drinking Water Guide.

3. Eat low-mercury seafood

   Choose low-mercury fish such as salmon, tilapia and pollock, rather than high-mercury tuna and swordfish.

4. Get your iodine

   Use iodized salt, especially while pregnant and nursing, and talk to your doctor about taking iodine-containing vitamins. Iodine buffers against chemicals such as perchlorate that can disrupt your thyroid system and affect your baby’s brain development during pregnancy and infancy.

5. Choose better body care products

   Just because the label says "gentle" or "natural" doesn't mean a product is safe for pregnancy. Look your products up on EWG's Skin Deep Cosmetics Database. Read the ingredients and avoid triclosan, fragrance and oxybenzone.

6. Wash maternity clothes before wearing

   Clothing is often coated with chemical treatments in the factory.

7. Identify lead sources and avoid them

   Test your tap water for lead and avoid any home remodeling if your house was built before 1978, when lead house paint was banned. Dust from sanding old paint is a common source of lead exposure.

8. Avoid painting.

   When getting your nursery ready, avoid painting and other chemical-intensive jobs.

9. Clean greener

   Household cleaners, bug killers, pet treatments and air fresheners can irritate kids’ and babies’ lungs – especially if they have asthma. Check out less toxic alternatives. Some ideas: vinegar in place of bleach, baking soda to scrub your tiles, hydrogen peroxide to remove stains. Use a wet mop/rag and a HEPA-filter vacuum to get rid of dust – which can contain contaminants. Leave shoes – and the pollutants they track inside -- at the door. Get EWG’s Tips for Greener Home Cleaning.

10. Avoid gasoline fumes

    Ask for your partner's help to fill the gas tank, or use full service..

11. Pick plastics carefully

    Some plastics contain toxic chemicals, including BPA and phthalates. Don't reuse single-use containers or microwave food in plastic containers. Avoid PVC by hanging a natural-fabric shower curtain. When remodeling, go with PVC-free flooring and pipes. Learn more about choosing safer plastics..