EWG analysis: North Carolina’s factory farms are everywhere – even floodplains and other flood-prone areas
|
County |
Poultry |
Swine |
Total |
||||
|
In 100-yr floodplain |
In 500-yr floodplain |
In 100ft buffer |
In 100-yr floodplain |
In 500-yr floodplain |
In 100ft buffer |
||
|
Duplin |
10 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
26 |
|
|
Wayne |
1 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
15 |
|
|
Pender |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
11 |
|
|
Craven |
6 |
2 |
8 |
||||
|
Robeson |
4 |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
Cumberland |
3 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
|||
|
Columbus |
4 |
1 |
5 |
||||
|
Jones |
1 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
|||
|
Lenoir |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
||
|
Wilkes |
2 |
3 |
5 |
||||
|
Bertie |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
|||
|
Harnett |
3 |
1 |
4 |
||||
|
Onslow |
1 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
|||
|
Pitt |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
||
|
Sampson |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|||
|
Bladen |
2 |
1 |
3 |
||||
|
Cabarrus |
2 |
1 |
3 |
||||
|
Edgecombe |
2 |
1 |
3 |
||||
|
Hertford |
2 |
1 |
3 |
||||
|
Gates |
1 |
1 |
2 |
||||
|
Iredell |
2 |
2 |
|||||
|
Nash |
2 |
2 |
|||||
|
Union |
2 |
2 |
|||||
|
Yadkin |
2 |
2 |
|||||
|
Alexander |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Ashe |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Anson |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Brunswick |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Beaufort |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Burke |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Caswell |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Catawba |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Gaston |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Greene |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Montgomery |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Johnston |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Lee |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Northampton |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Randolph |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Richmond |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Wake |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Warren |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Washington |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
Pasquotank |
1 |
1 |
|||||
|
37 |
33 |
27 |
34 |
10 |
15 |
156 |